How to Choose the Right AI Solution for Your Business
Parth Thakker
Co-Founder
The AI Solution Spectrum
Not every business needs a custom AI system. And not every business can get by with ChatGPT and a plugin. The key is matching your requirements to the right level of solution.
Let's map out the spectrum:
Level 1: Off-the-Shelf AI Tools
Examples: ChatGPT, Claude, Jasper, Copy.ai, Grammarly
Best for:
- Content creation assistance
- Research and summarization
- Code explanation and debugging
- Ad-hoc productivity boosts
Limitations:
- No access to your specific business data
- Generic responses not tailored to your context
- Manual copy-paste workflows
- No integration with your systems
Typical cost: $20-100/month per user
Level 2: AI-Enhanced SaaS
Examples: Intercom Fin, Zendesk AI, HubSpot AI, Notion AI
Best for:
- Businesses already using these platforms
- Standard use cases (support, sales, documentation)
- Quick deployment without technical resources
- Predictable per-seat pricing
Limitations:
- Limited customization
- Vendor lock-in
- Data stays in their ecosystem
- May not fit your specific workflow
Typical cost: $50-300/month per seat, often as add-ons
Level 3: Low-Code AI Platforms
Examples: Voiceflow, Botpress, Landbot, ManyChat
Best for:
- Chatbots with defined conversation flows
- Marketing automation with AI elements
- Teams with some technical capability
- Rapid prototyping and iteration
Limitations:
- Still requires design and maintenance
- Complexity ceiling for advanced use cases
- Integration depth varies
- Quality depends on your prompt engineering
Typical cost: $100-500/month based on usage
Level 4: Custom AI Agents
Examples: Purpose-built systems using OpenAI, Anthropic, or open-source models
Best for:
- Complex workflows requiring deep integration
- Proprietary data and knowledge bases (RAG)
- Specific domain requirements
- Maximum control and customization
- Competitive differentiation through AI
Limitations:
- Higher upfront investment
- Requires technical expertise (or a partner)
- Ongoing maintenance responsibility
- Longer time to deployment
Typical cost: $10,000-100,000+ development, plus infrastructure
The Decision Framework
Answer these five questions to identify your appropriate level:
1. How specific is your knowledge requirement?
Generic knowledge: Levels 1-2 work fine Industry-specific: Level 3 or 4 Company-specific: Level 4 required
If users need to access your product catalog, pricing, policies, or customer data, you need a solution that can integrate with your systems.
2. What's your integration complexity?
Count the systems your AI needs to interact with:
- 0-1 systems: Any level works
- 2-3 systems: Level 3+ recommended
- 4+ systems: Level 4 typically required
Each integration point adds complexity. Custom solutions handle this better than platforms with pre-built connectors.
3. What's your conversation complexity?
Simple Q&A: Levels 1-3 Multi-turn with context: Levels 3-4 Complex transactions with business logic: Level 4
If users need to complete multi-step processes—booking appointments, modifying orders, resolving issues—you need deeper integration.
4. What's your scale?
Under 100 conversations/day: Any level works 100-1,000 conversations/day: Level 3-4 cost-effective 1,000+ conversations/day: Level 4 economics improve significantly
At scale, the per-conversation cost of custom solutions becomes compelling vs. per-seat SaaS pricing.
5. What's your competitive context?
AI as commodity: Levels 1-2 fine AI as differentiator: Level 4 recommended
If your competitors all use the same Intercom AI, you're not creating competitive advantage. Custom solutions can embody your unique approach.
Build vs. Buy: The Real Trade-offs
Buy (Levels 1-3)
Advantages:
- Faster time to deployment
- Lower upfront investment
- Vendor handles infrastructure
- Regular updates and improvements
- Easier to budget (predictable costs)
Disadvantages:
- Less customization
- Vendor dependency
- May outgrow capabilities
- Data handling concerns
- Feature roadmap you don't control
Build (Level 4)
Advantages:
- Full customization
- Deep system integration
- Own your data and model training
- No per-seat licensing
- Competitive differentiation
Disadvantages:
- Higher upfront investment
- Requires technical resources
- Maintenance responsibility
- Longer implementation timeline
- Need to stay current with AI advances
The Hybrid Approach
Many businesses benefit from combining levels:
- Start with Level 1-2: Validate use case and user acceptance
- Prototype with Level 3: Test specific workflows
- Build Level 4 for high-value cases: Invest where it creates real advantage
You might use ChatGPT for internal research (Level 1), Intercom AI for tier-1 support (Level 2), and a custom RAG agent for technical product questions (Level 4).
Evaluating Custom AI Partners
If you're going the Level 4 route, here's what to look for in a development partner:
Technical competence:
- Experience with relevant AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source)
- Understanding of RAG architectures
- Track record with similar integrations
- Security and compliance awareness
Business understanding:
- Takes time to understand your use case
- Asks about success metrics, not just features
- Proposes appropriate (not over-engineered) solutions
- Clear about trade-offs and limitations
Ongoing relationship:
- Transparent about maintenance requirements
- Offers monitoring and support options
- Willing to start small and expand
- Knowledge transfer to your team
Red flags:
- Promises "AI will handle everything"
- Can't explain their approach in simple terms
- Ignores your existing technology stack
- No discussion of failure modes or edge cases
Making the Call
Here's a simplified decision tree:
-
Do you need AI to access your specific data?
- No → Start with Level 1-2
- Yes → Continue
-
Do you have 4+ systems to integrate?
- No → Level 3 might work
- Yes → Level 4 likely required
-
Is AI a core differentiator or competitive necessity?
- No → Level 3 may be sufficient
- Yes → Level 4 for maximum advantage
-
Do you have budget for custom development?
- No → Start with Level 2-3, plan upgrade path
- Yes → Evaluate Level 4 partners
The right answer depends on your specific context. But understanding where you fall on this spectrum helps you avoid both over-engineering and under-investing.
Not sure which level fits your needs? Let's figure it out together.